DEBT AND BIODIVERSITYMay 12, 2022
According to the Third World Network, addressing debt is crucial to halting biodiversity loss. Longstanding economic pressures have been, and are, pushing countries into decisions that result in diminishing biodiversity. Many countries have developed patterns of trade and investment and financial structures, all of which cause biodiversity loss. Hence, proposals on the table to address ‘wide-spread indebtedness in developing countries’, at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) held in Geneva, 14-29 March, 2022.
The CBD is the primary international treaty that aims to ensure the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of its components and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the use of genetic resources. Parties to the CBD are currently negotiating a post-2020 Global Diversity Framework (GDF), with specific goals and targets to guide countries in meeting their obligations. Debt has not previously been on the CBD agenda specifically, but there is increasing urgency to address the structural causes of biodiversity loss, including the economic factors that push countries into debt.
There are three primary ways that debt should be considered:
- Attached to sovereign debt and its repayment are a number of conditions that often require developing nations to depend on mining their raw materials (extractive industries) and exporting these and other products in order to earn foreign currency. This drives biodiversity loss further. The CBD Executive Secretary, Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, has affirmed that it will be difficult to achieve CBD objectives without addressing, for example, agricultural expansion in the Global South, driven by this need to ‘earn hard currency to pay their debts to inter-national lenders’ (iv).
- The same conditions and repayment terms are also an impediment to government spending on public needs and services, including the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Public funding is simply not available for biodiversity objectives and the mobilizing of resources to achieve them.
- Developed nations need to take account of the ongoing ecological debts, including significant losses of biodiversity, being incurred in developing nations and compensate them. These debts should be recognized in the way funds for CBD targets are raised and distributed.
Currently, Target 15 of the draft of the Global Diversity Framework recognises that finances have a large impact on biodiversity and it seeks to address this, requiring standards of disclosure and risk-based frameworks for companies and investors. Target 16 places emphasis on responsible personal consumption in line with biodiversity objectives. However, there are also equity aspects that are not ‘addressed, e.g., developing countries’ dependence on extractive exports.
One study of 65 nations found that ‘higher levels of debt service, structural adjustment and primary sector exports are associated with higher numbers of threatened mammals and birds.’ However, this requires more study.
Developing countries’ debt is estimated at $11 trillion; and the servicing of that debt is an estimated $3.4 trillion annually. One study concludes that developing country resources flowing toward foreign debt repayment tripled from 2011 to 2020. These patterns correlate with falling domestic spending. Now, countries’ climate vulnerabilities are being assessed by credit rating agencies, leading to an increase in interest rates on sovereign debt for the most vulnerable. This in turn leads to increased borrowing costs at a time when the crisis in the world economy today is that of unstainable sovereign debt. Adding insult to injury, the Group of 20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors met in Jakarta on 17-18 February 2022 to discuss global economic recovery, yet offered no new actions to combat the debt crisis.
Source: Third World Network (TWN), ‘Info Service on Finance and Development’ (4 Feb.2022) ‘Info Service on Biodiversity’ and ‘Traditional Knowledge’ (3 March2022). Edited by Mary Boyd.
This article appeared in GJOP Network Bulletin, Vol.12-2, March 2022.
Deep Sea Mining in the PacificMarch 23, 2023
In mid-January 2023 the French Parliament voted to ban deep-sea mining in its waters, in a move against the controversial practice. Deep-sea mining uses heavy...
Tricia Gemmell’s Speech for the Avila book launch of ‘In Her Voice’March 16, 2023
I want to thank you all for coming here tonight to celebrate with us, not just the publication of In Her Voice, but the whole journey that Australian Women Preach...
A RETURN TO TRADITIONAL FOOD?September 19, 2022
The dangers of too much dependence on imported food are currently being felt through consequences of the Ukraine war. Many countries imported wheat from Ukraine....
Pacific Island Countries Combating Plastic PollutionJuly 19, 2022
Pacific Islanders depend on the ocean for their food and livelihood. These small island countries are surrounded by oceans. The Pacific Island countries are...
CONTROL THE VAMPIRE COMPANIES!July 7, 2022
Oxfam’s Annual Report 2022, World Inequality, warns that 240 million more people are likely to fall into extreme poverty and face dire hunger because of the...
“one small step for women… one giant leap for herstory…”June 20, 2022
There is a little known story in the book of Numbers, chapter 27. The five daughters of Zelophehad dared to ask for an inheritance they felt was rightly theirs....
HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL POLITICAL GROUP ON DEEP SEA MINING LAUNCHEDJune 16, 2022
“As Pacific Leaders and custodians of this vast ocean, we are obliged to preserve the ocean for the sake of future generations and for all living and non-living...
BUILDING WOMEN’S CAPACITY FOR A MORE SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMMay 12, 2022
Agribusiness companies try to convince farmers to use chemical pesticides, claiming it makes the work easier and helps to produce higher yields. What they don’t...
The World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the Pandemic – the LatestMay 12, 2022
India and South Africa, in October 2020, proposed a temporary suspension of a number of provisions in WTO rules that protected intellectual property rights on...